America woke up one grand, beautiful morning and believed that it was a good idea to allow everyone to gamble whenever they wish. Once, gambling was often just considered “a thing to do in Vegas.” Now, you can unlock your own phone and play from there.
Meet self-exclusion tools — it pretty much owns the place.
What Exactly Is a Self-Exclusion System?
Self-exclusion is a voluntary system where a player opts themselves out of gambling access. Usually, this is someone that lacks self-control and ends up betting their child’s college fund. Once they sign up for this, casino and betting sites will then opt them out a multitude of ways.
It could be blocking them from signing into their accounts or removing them from any mailing lists that can tempt them from going back against their word. Sometimes, if the state has the system in place, this can even keep them out of real-world casinos.
Think of it like your own personal Out of Order sign.
America’s Self-Exclusion Programs
And now, here is where things are going to get messy. We are talking about casinos, after all. It would be concerning if something did not go wrong.
The U.S. does not have a unified self-exclusion system. Each state has their own set of rules. You can willingly ban yourself in New Jersey. But what if you took a little vacation to Nevada, saw a casino and the bright lights speak to you like the mask of Green Goblin. You could enter one of their casinos because you have the freedom to.
Some states may not even offer self-exclusion at all… we are all looking at you, Texas.
Essentially, you have multiple IDs with you to garner you access to multiple platforms. Now you are stuck wondering which ones let you in still or not.
What’s The Issue?
Honestly, what is not the issue at this point?
Loopholes: Self ban in just one place? Oh, cool, you can just go online or out of state and get your gambling there. Think of it as chocolate being banned in one store… Then you walk outside and every other place in the mall still sells it.
Enforcements: Some operators simply disregard these tools altogether. This is exactly how players “tip-toe” their way back into unattainable glory. This is especially likely for those that lack KYC triggers.
Trust Issues: Only a small percentage of Americans even trust the federal government with this information. We are talking about 33%. The current U.S. setup is practically seen as a sinking ship. Better get yourself a bucket.
Look, the UK is Doing it Right!
Sorry US — but these reports are not lying. Oh, dear America, bless your fragmented heart. You have managed to build yourself a self-exclusion system that is no better than a jigsaw puzzle crafted by newborn children. Enter the United Kingdom, where someone finally understands that gamblers who are clearly confused should not have to reinvent themselves every time they step out of state lines.
The UK actually has their own central online system known as GAMSTOP that allows a person to lock themselves out of every licensed online gambling institution, if they wish, with a singular press of a button. Once they see that you are there, the UK will block access to every online platform, lock you out of accounts, and put an end to all those unnecessary promotional e-mails.
So how is the U.S.? One casino’s DO NOT ENTER is just another one’s COME ON IN! Players in Louisiana can still gamble in Mississippi.
The argument here is not to say that the UK’s system is perfect. Enforcement hiccups exist everywhere you go. Those offshore, unlicensed platforms can still lure these guests in without issue.
Troubleshooting and Common Issues
Allow us to take a deeper dive into the carnival chaos. Yes, that is my new nickname for America’s self-exclusion system—catchy, right? So yes, as we know by now about that clever loophole where you can be excluded in your state. Yet if you take an out-of-state vacation, what happens in Vegas stays in Vegas. There is no national registry holding you back in this scenario.
Some venues are not as up-to-date as others. They are still using physical spreadsheets and outdated databases. That self-exclusion status could vanish as soon as it was even sent their way.
Oh, I apologize — did you just say enforcement? That is no more than a mere dream here. Plenty of online casinos, especially crypto casinos, are known for their lack of KYC and AML checks. Having these anonymous factors put into place makes enforcement almost impossible.
And not to forget about the most overlooked issue of them all: common human errors. Someone could have mis-typed your data, missed an ID check, or the staff that is in charge of enforcement are the reason the definition of nonchalance transpired.
Conclusion
We have made it, now staring into the abyss of America’s self-exclusion system. The intent behind it is noble, of course. Yet the execution? They practically said, “We tried and it did not work. Oh well!”
When comparing it to some place such as the UK, we can see with our own eyes how a more unified approach is not some fantasy. One system, clear rules, and most importantly, real accountability. Until the U.S. decides that consumer protection should be taken more seriously, self-exclusion is going to remain as less of a safeguard, and be deemed more as a polite suggestion.
We are dealing with a serious issue: polite suggestions should not even be a thing. It is as effective as someone like me asking for world domination nicely.