From Bridge Assets to Core Money Rails
Stablecoins have long been positioned as the digital bridge between traditional money and cryptocurrency. Pegged to fiat currencies like the U.S. dollar, euro, or other major units of account, they promise the stability that volatile tokens like Bitcoin don’t, and the programmability that traditional money doesn’t.
In 2025, this promise started to show up not just in trading desks and DeFi protocols, but in the underlying infrastructure of money itself. The total stablecoin market ballooned alongside wider crypto adoption, reaching hundreds of billions of dollars in supply and supporting massive transaction volumes across decentralized networks.
Layer‑two (L2) blockchain networks (secondary protocols built atop major chains to increase speed and cut fees) have become fertile ground for stablecoin activity. On these networks, stablecoins are not just used for trading or speculation; they’re moving value quickly and cheaply, challenging assumptions about what money does in a global digital economy.
Why Layer‑Two Networks Matter
Layer‑two networks such as Arbitrum, Optimism, and Base are designed to solve a core problem with blockchain money: cost and speed. On base layers like Ethereum, transaction fees can spike during busy periods; on layer‑two rollups, fees are often a fraction of that, and settlement times can be near‑instant.
That matters for stablecoins because their primary value proposition isn’t price appreciation- it’s movement. A digital dollar that costs more in fees than it’s worth in use isn’t useful. On L2s, a stablecoin can:
Move across wallets in seconds
Be used for payments without prohibitive gas fees
Enable micropayments, subscriptions, and near‑real‑time settlement
In 2025, layer‑two networks processed over 1.9 million daily transactions, with stablecoins making up the lion’s share of payment and transfer activity on these layers.
At the same time, institutional and retail users alike were finding that stablecoins on L2s could rival traditional rails in terms of efficiency, cost, and speed. This is even if the raw numbers were still smaller than global banking volumes.
A Growing Stablecoin Presence on L2
By late 2025, stablecoins had carved out a significant niche on layer‑two ecosystems.
On Ethereum’s layer‑two networks alone, more than $13.5 billion worth of stablecoins were circulating; a milestone that highlighted the demand for digital fiat on fast, cheap rails.
Stablecoins on such networks aren’t just static deposits. They are actively used for:
Decentralized finance (lending, borrowing, yield farming)
Payments and settlement beyond exchanges
Cross‑chain transfers and liquidity routing
This usage mirrors a broader trend: stablecoins accounted for a very large portion of overall blockchain transaction value in 2025, with hundreds of trillions in transfer volume being reported on major networks and layer‑twos alike. While not all of that volume translates into end‑user economic activity, it underscores the sheer scale of stablecoin flow in global digital finance.
The Bank Challenge - Real, But Not Imminent
This is where the narratives around stablecoins “outpacing banks” come in. Legacy banking rails, particularly for cross‑border payments and settlement, are often slow, expensive, and limited by traditional compliance and batch processing. Stablecoins on layer‑two networks, by contrast, can settle value 24/7 with minimal friction, offering an alternative that traditional banks find difficult to match.
In emerging markets, especially where banking access is limited or costly, cheap stablecoin transfers on L2 networks have become a practical means of moving value.
But it’s important to temper the more dramatic comparisons:
Traditional banks still dominate everyday retail deposits, lending markets, and credit creation.
Banks are deeply integrated into regulatory and compliance frameworks that stablecoins lack in many jurisdictions.
Many stablecoin transactions currently involve trading, DeFi, or intra‑crypto settlement, not consumer payments directly replacing bank transfers.
No credible data yet shows stablecoins replacing traditional bank payment infrastructure at scale. But the narrative is shifting: where banks once saw blockchain as a speculative curiosity, they now recognize stablecoins, especially on L2 networks, as a potential alternative rail for real‑time value transfer.
Risks and Roadblocks
Stablecoins carry significant regulatory and structural challenges. Unlike insured bank deposits, most stablecoin holdings lack explicit government backing. Global regulators, including in the U.S. and Europe, have been debating frameworks for stablecoin issuance, custody, and redemption in 2025, with some arguing for tighter rules to protect consumers and financial stability.
There are also technological risks: smart contract vulnerabilities, bridge exploits, and interoperability issues have caused losses in the past in broader DeFi activity. Users and institutions alike must weigh these factors as stablecoins gain broader use.
Finally, while layer‑two stablecoins offer technical advantages, widespread adoption hinges on regulatory clarity and integration with legacy systems; something that neither wholesale banking nor decentralized networks have fully solved.
A Signal - Not a Takeover
So can layer‑two stablecoins outpace traditional banks by 2026? Not in deposits, lending, or broad retail payments yet. But as alternatives for cross‑border settlement, micropayments, and real‑time transfer, they are increasingly relevant.
Stablecoins on layer‑two networks have already changed how value moves in crypto: cheaper, faster, and more programmable than legacy rails. For corporations, financial institutions, and everyday users, this isn’t just a technical improvement; it’s a structural shift in how money flows.
What remains to be seen is whether this shift becomes a complement to, competition with, or extension of traditional banking, and how regulators and financial institutions adapt as these rails continue to evolve.